Lachlan Vickery vs Marcus Schoeman Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 05 Aug at 03:43 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
L. Vickery vs M. Schoeman

AUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win

AUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Vickery 1 - 0 Schoeman
They have played 2 sets in total, with Lachlan Vickery winning 2 and Marcus Schoeman winning 0. The last match between Lachlan Vickery and Marcus Schoeman was at the M15 Brisbane, 05-08-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Hard, with Lachlan Vickery getting the victory 6-4 7-5.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Vickery | 1 |
| Schoeman | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) M15 Brisbane(08-05-25)
L. Vickery vs M. Schoeman H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 56.52% (39-30) | Career Total W/L | 44.44% (4-5) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
L. Vickery vs M. Schoeman Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: Vickery is currently winning 41.18% of points on their second serve, while Schoeman has not won any points.
- Return Game Stats: Vickery has secured 41.67% of points on their opponent's second serve, compared to Schoeman's 0%. For first-serve returns, Vickery has 34.15%, and Schoeman remains at 0%.
- Under Pressure Analysis: Vickery saves 40% of breakpoints while Schoeman saves none, crucial for in-game betting.
- Performance Overview: Over the past year, Vickery has a win rate of 55%, while Schoeman boasts a perfect 100%, but with significantly fewer matches played.
- Best Surface: Vickery thrives on hard courts with a 58% win rate, while Schoeman shows a balanced 50% on hard surfaces.
- Player Level: Both players have competed primarily in $10K tournaments, with Vickery winning 55% of 20 matches and Schoeman winning both matches played.
- Opponent Quality: Vickery's opponents have an average ranking of 252.2, whereas Schoeman has not faced opponents with any recorded ranking.
- Deciding Set Performance: If the match reaches a deciding set, Schoeman has won all, while Vickery has clinched 33% of such sets.
- Breakpoint Conversion: Vickery has converted 22.22% of breakpoint opportunities, with Schoeman failing to convert any thus far.
Editorial Prediction (August 5, 2025, UTC):
Considering recent performances, Vickery demonstrates a clear edge in several key areas. Vickery excels notably in second serve points and breakpoint opportunities, which are critical in closely contested matchups.
Schoeman's limited match experience and lack of success in key statistics suggest potential vulnerabilities. Vickery's consistent surface performance further strengthens their standing, particularly on hard courts.
Although Schoeman has an unblemished win record over the past year, the limited number of matches and lower-ranked competition temper expectations.
Analyzing these factors, Vickery emerges as the likely victor in the upcoming contest due to superior second serve performance and greater experience in tougher matches.
Lachlan Vickery vs Marcus Schoeman Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
L. Vickery vs M. Schoeman H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 9 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 2:1:22 | Average Match Time | 2:1:22 |
| 51% (39/77) | 1st Serve % | 57% (37/65) |
| 74% (29/39) | 1st Serve Win % | 51% (19/37) |
| 42% (16/38) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (13/28) |
| 50% (5/10) | Break Pts Won % | 43% (3/7) |
| 51% (33/65) | Return Points Win % | 42% (32/77) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
L. Vickery Recent Matches Played
M. Schoeman Recent Matches Played

L. Vickery vs M. Schoeman Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56.52% (39/30) | YTD Win/Loss | 44.44% (4/5) |
| 56.86% (87/66) | Sets Win/Loss | 45.00% (9/11) |
| 51.84% (775/720) | Games Win/Loss | 48.86% (107/112) |
| 58.21% (39/28) | Hard Win/Loss | 44.44% (4/5) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.02 |
| 72 | Aces Total | 2 |
| 0.09 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.01 |
| 66 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 227.43 | Average Opponent Rank | 99.33 |
| 60% (926/1555) | 1st Serve % | 57% (37/65) |
| 63% (588/926) | 1st Serve Win % | 51% (19/37) |
| 48% (305/629) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (13/28) |
| 34% (51/148) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (3/7) |
| 38% (595/1586) | Return Points Win % | 42% (32/77) |
| 56.52% (39/30) | Futures W/L | 44.44% (4/5) |
| 57% (39/68) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 44% (4/9) |
| 71% (5/7) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 75% (3/4) |
| 44% (7/16) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 90% (39/35) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 75% (4/3) |
| 10% (39/4) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 25% (4/1) |
| 13% (30/4) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (5/1) |